Peace Operations Are What States Make of Them: Why Future Evolution is More Likely Than Extinction

“Peace operations are a highly resilient international institution for managing armed conflict. Their resilience derives from what constructivists in International Relations theory call collective intentionality and the malleable constitutive rules that define and structure such missions,” write KATHARINA P. COLEMAN and PAUL D. WILLIAMS in the journal Contemporary Security Policy.

“Despite a range of current constraints, challenges, and crises, peace operations are unlikely to become extinct unless a critical mass of states consistently withdraw material support for them and explicitly denigrate the concept of peace operations itself. 

“We see little evidence that both these things are likely to occur. However, the constitutive rules guiding peace operations are likely to continue to evolve due to ideational and material changes. While the proliferation of actors and mission types makes precise predictions impossible, we expect an evolution both in how various actors define their own peace operations and how these actors relate to each other.”

Katharina P. Coleman & Paul D. Williams (2021) Peace operations are what states make of them: Why future evolution is more likely than extinction, Contemporary Security Policy, DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2021.1882802